Oh yes, this is absolutely true! Though I don't believe it's just about laying people off to lower costs (if you think about it, corp. is in CA and you hire someone in bum-f no-where, you aren't supporting their salary that much - pay based on employee location). I believe a good deal of this has to do with the C-Suite having a portfolio full of commercial real estate and they're losing a ton of money on a personal level.
I can't say that's the fault of the CEO or anyone else. In other words, the company's management is in disarray. But it's also boring for the CEO to speak out about it.
I haven't experienced layoffs but recently learned my company will no longer be hiring 'remote only' and any current remote employees will no longer be eligible to apply for internal promotions. Same RTO tactic just with a slight twist....
test
Yeah, you're not imagining it. A lot of remote folks seem to be the first to go—especially if they’re not near HQ. Feels less like a coincidence and more like a quiet RTO pressure tactic. No official policy, but the pattern’s definitely there.
same here. I was remote and top performer. still got cut. meanwhile someone on-site with half my output is still around. make it make sense
they can’t say remote bad outright, so they just start trimming the edges and pretend it’s all about performance or alignment or whatever
my manager lowkey hinted at this a few months ago… like “proximity to leadership is becoming more important.” which is just code for “if we can’t see you, you’re disposable”
it’s 100% a quiet shift. companies don’t wanna deal with the PR mess of a forced RTO, so they’re just “restructuring” remote people out instead 💀
Get You May Like jobs delivered straight to your inbox 📬
Not trying to start some wild theory but I’ve been watching layoffs hit across multiple companies and there’s a weird trend I can’t unsee. Almost every person I know who’s gotten laid off recently? They were fully remote. Meanwhile, a lot of the folks still left standing are hybrid or in-office.
It’s making me wonder if this is part of some quiet shift. Like companies can’t legally force everyone back, so they’re just laying off remote workers first. Maybe to pressure people back in. Maybe just because they think remote folks are easier to let go.
I know it’s not everywhere, but it’s enough to make me nervous. I'm remote too and feeling like I have a target on my back. Is anyone else seeing this? Or hearing the same thing inside their company?